Climate@stad
www.bbc.co.uk
No shit. As if we didn't know. Doesn't make it less depressing.
globalnews.ca
Unsurprising. And I suspect the results wouldn't be very different elsewhere. And that's why we're fucked.
appleinsider.com
I'm not big on Apple. I don't own a single Apple device. And I'm acutely aware there's a lot of problems with talking up the climate effort of companies whose profits are intimately linked to pushing consumerism, but it's good they're at least making an effort to be less shit than many others can be bothered to...
www.theguardian.com
cross-posted from: https://feddit.uk/post/3402975 > The increasing popularity of ultra-heavy SUVs in England means a conventional-engined car bought in 2013 will, on average, have lower carbon emissions than one bought new today, new research has found. > > The study by the climate campaign group Possible said there was a strong correlation between income and owning a large SUV, which meant there was a sound argument for “polluter pays” taxes for vehicle emissions based on size. Huge, bulky cares emit more?!? Who would've thought?
www.theguardian.com
cross-posted from: https://derp.foo/post/320312 > There is a [discussion on Hacker News](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37898667), but feel free to comment here as well.
www.bbc.com
It's hard to get the scale of these wind farms until you see how tiny that ship is next to the thing... Yikes.
cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/3083945 > > Court's ruling on environmental impact law clips federal government's wings on climate change, expert says
