ASDraptor 3d ago • 100%
At this point I can't even blame twitter. If after everything they are doing, you still stay on twitter, the only one to blame for whatever happens to your data, is you.
ASDraptor 3d ago • 100%
I love how they gave a TL;DR right at the beginning of the article, it made me stay and read the rest out of respect for the author.
Google lives of the ads (among the things), of course a browser they develop is going to screw the add-ons that block ads. Solution: avoid google if you want an ad-free internet.
Edit: typo
ASDraptor 4d ago • 100%
The amount of creativity in the indie world is insane. It's been a lot of years since I last played a AAA game because of this.
Have you ever played as a crow? There's an indie game for that.
Have you ever played a shooter in which you literally shoot people trendy clothes instead of bullets?
The creativity is there, you just won't find it in your typical AAA, because that game's only goal is to milk your wallet.
ASDraptor 4d ago • 100%
There's no collapse of creativity. There's just a collapse of the industry that now is in the hands of shareholders whose only goal is profit.
As soon as your company gets controlled by those, your creativity becomes a need to make another soulless "blockbuster".
Look at the indie world instead. There is creativity, it's just incompatible with the AAA business model.
ASDraptor 4d ago • 88%
Funny. I was in a group of people (was, in past tense) that made fun of me because I was the first one to change minds if new evidence showed that I was wrong. They saw it as a weakness, as if my ideas were wrong because I was able to change them if I was proved wrong.
I guess this helps explain why I "was" and not "am" a part of that group anymore.
ASDraptor 5d ago • 100%
To sum it up: twitter's business is so irrelevant that they don't qualify to be subject to the DMA.
Ketamine Karen must be hurting after such a burn.
Important note: We are talking about the Digital Markets Act, not to be confused with the Digital Services Act.
ASDraptor 5d ago • 100%
Honestly, I am not very talkative. I am bad at small talk so I rarely speak unless asked directly about something specific.
Because of this, I believe that if someone asks me about something, it's because they are interested in what I have to say about it.
To answer your question, I will not go to tell someone about my last trip unless they ask me about it because I consider that it's not that interesting to the others if (like I do) they are not asking about it.
ASDraptor 5d ago • 80%
I am on the spectrum. And no, i don't. And I don't think of it as being an asshole, I simply don't care about it because it just is something unimportant. I mean, if something bad happened to them, I'll be the first one to ask, but if they are telling me how nice was their trip it's like... well, yeah? It's expected. You make a trip to have a good time, so of course you had a good time.
I guess i consider it innecessary because is the expected outcome.
With that said, I will listen to what they say and remember it, but that doesn't mean I find it interesting unless there is something remarkable about it.
ASDraptor 2w ago • 100%
It was a supermarket. There was also GMO-free salt. I think it was a marketing stunt, but you never know, I guess you could find genetically altered salt if you searched hard enough?
ASDraptor 2w ago • 100%
I've seen gluten-free salt.
SALT.
Sometimes is useful info, sometimes a marketing stunt.
Seriously, salt.
ASDraptor 2w ago • 80%
Onions. Damn onions. I will puke if I feel a piece of onion in my mouth. There are other foods, but onion is the worst for me. I can understand those folks.
ASDraptor 2w ago • 100%
Disagree. Serious candidate for aneurysm posting.
ASDraptor 2w ago • 100%
Don't forget the 5G exposition after the boosters to activate them, otherwise they give just cancer without the fun superpowers.
Source: am autistic and always on time.
ASDraptor 2w ago • 94%
Every Nintendo fan.
ASDraptor 3w ago • 100%
Thanks for the reply. Makes everything easier to understand. I guess we're going to see a boom in vpn subs in the next months thanks to soccer mafia.
ASDraptor 3w ago • 100%
Sounds to me that, in practice, rights holders will notify providers of suspected infringement, triggering their requirement to report to authorities, and it goes from there.
Yes. You are right. But if hypothethically my ip gets somehow reported, it could trigger this "awareness". Can proton know what I'm browsing?
The new "Omnibus" law in italy tries to block piracy by basically creating a situation in which you will face jail time if you get caught watching an illegal streaming (or your IP does) and ISP and IP providers (they name VPN and DNS services) will face jail time too if they don't notify the authorities of "illegal activity" done by their users. E.g. if I watch a soccer streaming from a pirate site, apparently, my VPN provider (in this case, Proton) will have to notify the authorities that I am watching that pirated content. This is madness in so many ways, starting by the fact that the law implies that both my ISP and my VPN provider must spy my traffic to see if I am watching any illegal content. I wanted to know if Proton has anything to say about all of this for their Italian customers. How are you guys going to face this? Will you simply stop providing the service? Will you ignore the law because you are not an italian company? Or will you spy our traffic to see if we are watching a soccer game? I'm quite worried right now about the implications of this law to my privacy. Not because I pirate content but because the punishement for those who don't notify the authorities means that to avoid legal problems, services like Proton will have to actually read our traffic.
ASDraptor 3w ago • 94%
They have power all right. It's quite simple: tell the nazi that he's on his own. That's it. The moment the nazi loses his "I'll call dad" card, we'll see how well he goes in the territory.
ASDraptor 3w ago • 80%
It's astounding the amount of buzzwords the tech bros will use every time they try to sell us some new AI bullshit.
ASDraptor 3w ago • 94%
A combination of things:
First, misinformation travels at light speed thanks to the lack of control in social media and internet.
Then, we have a generational crisis that is causing a strong lack of confidence in the actual political class because they are seen as incapable of resolving our generation issues.
Add to this that there is the perception of a strong migration problem (pushed by the far right).
The far right capitalizes on all of the above.
Also, it is treated like a cult by its followers because they thrive in environments where the intelligence is not required (it's actually encouraged to not be intelligent and critical thinker).
The far right is also known to be populist, and they don't need to be held accountable for their lies because their followers act as a cult.
If you sum this all up, you get our situation: young people voting fascism even more than boomers (look at Germany's last election).
It really is scary.
ASDraptor 3w ago • 100%
I do have as many too at work.
I use one VM for each iteration of my automation software. Our factory has machines ranging from the 90s to present day, and they use different software environments to be programmed. In order to minimize the risk of data loss, we have one virtual machine with every software environment, that way if one gets corrupted, the damage is contained. It also makes them easier to export to new computers when we need to replace ours.