How do you deploy in 10 seconds?
  • "Initials" by "Florian Körner", licensed under "CC0 1.0". / Remix of the original. - Created with dicebear.comInitialsFlorian Körnerhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearAU
    Aurenkin
    5m ago 100%

    Sounds like you need to add some sleep statements somewhere in your deployment scripts if you want to deploy in 10 seconds

    1
  • Trump calls judge 'evil' for releasing case files before election
  • "Initials" by "Florian Körner", licensed under "CC0 1.0". / Remix of the original. - Created with dicebear.comInitialsFlorian Körnerhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearAU
    Aurenkin
    2d ago 100%

    Any information harmful to me must not be released before the election or it's interference

    Any information harmful to my opponents must be released before the election or it's interference

    36
  • California's richest cities were told to build housing—but made it a crime to be homeless instead
  • "Initials" by "Florian Körner", licensed under "CC0 1.0". / Remix of the original. - Created with dicebear.comInitialsFlorian Körnerhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearAU
    Aurenkin
    2d ago 100%

    Ain't it funny how the factory's doors close?

    'Round the time that the school doors close?

    'Round the time that a hundred thousand jail cells

    Open up to greet you like the reaper?

    Oasis

    This is no oasis

    2
  • 12 Years and $700 Million Later, What's Going on With Star Citizen's Development?
  • "Initials" by "Florian Körner", licensed under "CC0 1.0". / Remix of the original. - Created with dicebear.comInitialsFlorian Körnerhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearAU
    Aurenkin
    3d ago 58%

    Exactly, nothing is happening. That's why there wasn't a patch dropped today or anything, no server meshing tests and no major patches released to the player testers. Nothing to see here.

    2
  • It's just a conversation starter honey, don't take it too seriously [Dark Side of the Horse]
  • "Initials" by "Florian Körner", licensed under "CC0 1.0". / Remix of the original. - Created with dicebear.comInitialsFlorian Körnerhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearAU
    Aurenkin
    3d ago 93%

    Are you?

    Do you have hooves instead of hands and feet?

    How did you type this message?

    The ergonomics of input devices must be really difficult for you, I guess you probably have to custom build a lot of things.

    14
  • I, an Atheist, have been banned from c/AtheistMemes
  • "Initials" by "Florian Körner", licensed under "CC0 1.0". / Remix of the original. - Created with dicebear.comInitialsFlorian Körnerhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearAU
    Aurenkin
    4d ago 95%

    It's a real shame that a lot of atheist communities online are just circle jerk condescending bs. There are some interesting discussions to be had but I guess we'll have to look elsewhere.

    45
  • r u winning son?
  • "Initials" by "Florian Körner", licensed under "CC0 1.0". / Remix of the original. - Created with dicebear.comInitialsFlorian Körnerhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearAU
    Aurenkin
    6d ago 100%

    There was a board game cafe I used to go to and in their bathroom there was a toilet out in the open near the sinks (as well as regular stalls). Someone eventually asked and apparently the place used to be a nightclub and it was for people to throw up.

    28
  • ### Introduction Firstly, although the tone of this post may be somewhat critical I want to say that I do appreciate the thought behind creating the bot and the work that has gone into it. The idea of being more aware of media bias in the news we consume is a good one and I commend the folks who actively took a step to try and advance that cause. However, I believe that unfortunately the current solution might have the opposite effect. ### Suggestion My suggestion is to keep the factuality and trustworthiness ratings of the bot as while they are still somewhat problematic, they can at least be more objectively assessed and sourced. The bias rating, however, has two pretty major problems as far as I can see. ### Reason One - Inconsistent Definitions Left and right do not have consistent definitions to everyone, particularly in different regions. Something considered left in the US for example might be considered centre or right in other parts of the world. This means that people's read of the bias rating of the bot may be inaccurate. ### Reason Two - Opaque and Contradictory Bias Analysis Secondly and the major issue I have, is that the bias rating does not seem to have a consistent methodology and I have seen troubling inconsistencies in the justification given for certain ratings. That means we are potentially being misinformed and having the opposite than intended effect of trying to accurately account for potential bias in the sources of our news. #### Example - BBC The example that I looked into was the bias rating for [the BBC](https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/bbc/), which the bot describes as centre left. However, if we look at the justification for this rating it seems contradictory, with most evidence pointing to it leaning right: > According to New Statesman's research, examining the impartiality of the BBC's reporting shows that they lean right certain areas, such as business, immigration, and religion... > > ... > > When reporting general news, the BBC always sources its information and uses minimal loaded words in headlines... Sounds like the BBC should be rated as centre right based on this analysis. However, the media bias folks go on to say this: > When it comes to reporting on the USA and, in particular, former President Donald Trump, there is a negative tone directed at Trump and his policies. This point, referencing a single article which is debatably overly negative, seems to be sufficient justification for them to rate the whole source as left leaning. If you check the reasoning for the rating, however, it mentions nothing about this anti Trump bias at all, instead stating: > Overall, we rate the BBC Left-Center biased based on story selection that slightly favors the left. This assertion is not justified in any way in the analysis they have provided. ### Conclusion I understand that disagreeing with one particular rating isn't necessarily worthy of action in it's own right, but I think this example highlights a more fundamental problem with the rating system as a whole. If there is not a reasonable and consistent methodology followed, then the rating system itself is highly subject to individual biases. Therefore, I believe that by including this rating in all the news posts, we are lending credibility to an organisation which unfortunately does not seem to have earned it. Thanks for taking the time to read my suggestion and I hope nobody takes this as an attack of any kind. This is a difficult problem and I appreciate any effort to solve it, I actually was feeling quite positive about the bot until I looked into how the ratings were actually done. EDIT: Also, I hope this is the right community to provide this feedback. It seems the bot has blocked me so I'm not able to check the support link that it provides.

    17
    6
    youtu.be

    I thought this was a nice 10 minute recap of what the replication layer stuff is, the plans we know about from way back and where we're at now.

    16
    3