Phoenix3875 18h ago • 87%
Spell out numbers under 10, but not when it's divisible by three or five.
Phoenix3875 5d ago • 96%
This is a triumph. I'm making a note here, "HUGE SUCCESS".
Phoenix3875 7d ago • 100%
Did they test it on alligators or really hungry alligators?
Phoenix3875 1w ago • 100%
Bullshit Jobs get bullshit treatment.
Phoenix3875 1w ago • 100%
J Moore, the Moore in the wildly used Boyer-Moore string search algorithm, has a first name of a single letter, J. It's not an abbreviation.
Phoenix3875 1w ago • 100%
It really is like that. I found a report on People.cn from 2015. I guess it's just the impact range is expanding. Personally I only heard of people experiencing this post-covid.
Phoenix3875 1w ago • 100%
For people not in public sectors, application for passports are okay-ish.
For others, I can only speculate. Most of the public sector workers already have passports from years ago. I don't know if they have any kind of restrictions on new applications. To me, the Immigration Administration of the Ministry of Public Safety (who issues passports) feels more like a "routine" type of branch of the central government, but I could be wrong.
Phoenix3875 2w ago • 100%
Fight Club's Guerilla Terrorists piss in the food of elite restaurant instead.
Clothes dirty, code clean!
Phoenix3875 2w ago • 93%
It's been that way since 3 or 4 years ago. The way it works is that you'll hand in the passport and if you want to use it, you'd have to apply for it. The party branch (党委) usually has quotas for each year and therefore will seek excuses to reject the application.
Phoenix3875 2w ago • 100%
Unless you do something special depending on the day (like going to church on Sundays), aren't the two options the same? They are both 4 up 3 down periods.
Phoenix3875 2w ago • 100%
Haha, but it's really a pack of tools, more like a toolbox.
Phoenix3875 3w ago • 100%
Now don't look at the lamp next to your sofa too closely.
Phoenix3875 3w ago • 100%
Your money at least.
Phoenix3875 4w ago • 100%
And that's why you don't see cooking mouse no more.
Phoenix3875 4w ago • 100%
// TODO: Leave the code cleaner than you found
Phoenix3875 4w ago • 100%
In recent git versions (>2.23), git restore
and git restore --staged
are the preferred ways to discard changes in the working tree (git checkout -- .
) and staged changes (git reset --
) respectively.
Phoenix3875 4w ago • 100%
GTA_irl
Phoenix3875 4w ago • 100%
My point today is that, if we wish to count lines of code, we should not regard them as "lines produced" but as "lines spent": the current conventional wisdom is so foolish as to book that count on the wrong side of the ledger.
——On the cruelty of really teaching computing science - E.W. Djikstra
Phoenix3875 4w ago • 100%
The first rule of the Loaf Club…
> [Sanders said](https://twitter.com/BernieSanders/status/1816498279133393137) that the recent, brazen push by billionaires to influence Vice President Kamala Harris to dump Khan from her hypothetical presidential cabinet is yet another show of the corrupting influence of money in politics. > > “Here’s why we have to overturn Citizens United & end Big Money in politics: Billionaire Reid Hoffman donated $7 million to the Harris campaign. Now, he wants her, as president, to fire an outstanding members \[sic] of the Biden Administration, FTC Chair Lina Khan,” Sanders said in a post on social media on Thursday. “Not acceptable.” > > In recent days, billionaires and large Democratic donors [have been speaking out](https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/24/business/kamala-harris-business-policies-economy.html) against Khan, who represents a threat to corporate interests. > > LinkedIn cofounder Reid Hoffman — a venture capitalist [deeply enmeshed](https://greylock.com/team/reid-hoffman/) with corporate interests — came out publicly against Khan [in an interview with *CNN*](https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/26/business/reid-hoffman-kamala-harris-ftc-khan/index.html) this week, likening Khan’s efforts to rein in corporate abuses as a “war” on corporate power. Hoffman, who [campaign filings show](https://www.fec.gov/data/receipts/individual-contributions/?contributor_name=Reid+hoffman\&min_date=01%2F01%2F2016\&min_amount=2000) has donated $7 million to Harris’s campaign, outright said he “would hope that Vice President Harris would replace her.” > > […] > > Another billionaire, Barry Diller, chairman of holding company IAC, also [brazenly announced](https://twitter.com/SquawkCNBC/status/1816826072236982681) that he would mount a lobbying effort against Khan for her crackdowns in an interview with *CNBC*. Diller has [pledged to donate](https://twitter.com/SquawkCNBC/status/1816826072236982681) the maximum amount to Harris’s campaign, called Khan a “dope” and said that he would lobby Harris to dump Khan. > > […] > > Many other similar missives from [donors have come anonymously](https://prospect.org/power/2024-07-26-corporate-wishcasting-attack-lina-khan/), with [one donor telling](https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/24/business/kamala-harris-business-policies-economy.html) *The New York Times* that Harris is open to the idea. The Harris campaign has said that it has not had discussions about Khan’s future so far — though Wall Street donors have been pushing Democrats [to drop Khan for months](https://truthout.org/articles/wall-street-donors-are-reportedly-pushing-biden-to-fire-ftc-chair/). > > […] > > The replacement of Khan on the cabinet would be a major loss for backers of the antitrust movement; her appointment by Biden as FTC chair was lauded as a significant step forward for the administration’s purported efforts to take on increasing corporate power. > > Under Khan, the FTC has taken on some of the largest corporations in America, including tech giants like Amazon, Microsoft and Meta, pharmaceutical giants like Amgen, and other giants like Kroger. It also created a new rule banning employers from including noncompete clauses in worker contracts, a move that the agency said would raise worker wages by $300 billion annually.
Coming from another country, I always wonder why the two utility companies I have here in the UK, Thames Water and Octopus Energy, would calculate an amount that they think I should pay monthly, instead of just charge whatever I used last month. To me, the latter way makes much more sense and is the standard practice in the countries I lived before. The amount they calculated seems to generate either a huge credit balance, or a huge underestimation. Thames Water changed my monthly bill from £29 to £7, and then to £17 over the course of a year and a half. Octopus Energy built up more than £200 of a credit balance (not sure if it's a result of the UK government energy gift credit last winter), then set a minimal amount of £61 monthly. They say the purpose is to make sure that the credit balance would be always be more than £100. Okay...but why? If I want to save money, I'd go to a bank. I could see that it might make sense if the measurement is not as easy or accurate, but come on, it's the 21st century and the meter shows me my energy usage by the hour, surely they can calculate the exact amount rather than pull a random number out of nowhere?
can be used as a bunker at war
It seems to be [a bug](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1807418) for Firefox Android, but I had an empty space at the top when using wefwef as a PWA. Setting the toolbar position to "bottom" in the three-dot setting menu seems to fix it.