Oh ho ho, looks like we got a haaaaard worker over here. Yeah dude, I'm a trust fund baby 10 million dollar loan from my father to open my professional esport beenie baby collection company that I hired someone else to run and yet still have an adversity to bootlicking bosses.

Or, I'm a regular guy who also still hates bootlicking abused of power.

Lick lick slurp slurp but it sounds to me like you moved on from the boot ifyouknowwhatimsayin.

"Peaceful revolution impossible makes violent revolution inevitable" people when violent revolution starts (👁 ͜ʖ👁)

It's crazy to see people justify this. I wonder how they'd feel getting microscoped at work until fired. There's always a cause if your scummy enough.

Lick lick lick slurp is all I see with this comment.

Clinton went, biden didn't. Also "Clinton, and Biden". What that comma for?

As always!

I love the paranoia of you nerds. It's valid but idk how you spare the effort.

It's the principle of it.

That's evil bruh

Someone got onto me for "derailing the conversation". The conversation in question was a quip. Super serious business only.

True, and that's a failing on them. Real baby shit

The bias bot is biased and mislabels sources in a way that legitimizes news sources that should not be given that, particularly it labels alt right news as factual and non Western sources (al Jazeera) as non factual due to being written by brown people.

It's a propaganda bot trying to dictate legitimacy.

Thank you

Derail a thread with a small side suggestion. That's a lot of pushback to a small request. Almost like you actively wish to not have enslaved people humanized in conversation.

You can always just not say it yourself. To actively try and start fights about it implies malice.

Changing the language you use about a thing changes your perception of that thing. This is data driven reality of making small changes to the way you talk actively changes the thought process on it. You can be lazy and not do it, it's your own language. But that's all your doing. Being lazy, or actively reactionary.

Seems a lot of people here are against the humanizing of enslaved people's. Weird.

God forbid someone on a thread based system bring up a related topic on the side. Like, is that really your complaint? Oh no guys, the humanization of enslaved people's is derailing this 3rd person's quip. Quick, we must stop him!

Silly billy you are.

It's just good to reinforce the idea that enslaved people's were people who were enslaved. Not a profession, slave was not their job, it was their status.

Plus studies have shown that by using these people first language, especially while teaching the subject, results in higher empathy for enslaved people and reminds that their status as a slave was one forced upon them and continually so rather than the simple status they were born with.

It's not a huge problem or anything, but it isn't hard to toss in every now and then and only does good.

Small suggestion to use "enslaved people's" rather than "slaves"

One of us has a morally defensible position backed with historical examples of similar events and the other doesn't know how to even recognize a genocide is happening before his very eyes. That's really the crux of the whole thing. You simply don't see the wholesale slaughter of brown people as a genocide. My argument relies entirely on the moral backbone that opposing genocide is righteous. Your argument is to refuse your own eyes.

If that was your family, born behind a wall and then bombed to hell, I bet you would have a different tune. Sadly for people like you with no moral philosophy whatsoever, having no empathy for people experiencing things you don't is pretty normal. It's why Nazi Germany was able to do what it did. It's why south Africa got away with what it did. It's why the native Americans were genocided as they were. And it's why right at this moment you fence sit a slaughter.