Snapz 2h ago • 100%
Takes a real and TRULY out of touch individual to drop "monotonicity paradox" with ZERO attempt at offering context to the reader - either this is an actual thing (in which case you're an asshole) or it's a full on fabrication (which would make you a liar).
Behavior, like what you've demonstrated here, is a phenomena all too easily explained by the Hammersmith Bongo Reversal, it's supercilious proxy darvents and various derivative hyper dogmas.
Snapz 2h ago • 100%
I hadn't heard the vaccine thing? What did she say?
Snapz 8h ago • 100%
Because we are extremely simple and self obsessed animals on the whole. At the intersection of those two things, we regularly conflate base familiarity with earned trust. A bit of a narcissistic drive to tell ourselves that... if WE know about something, it MUST be good, otherwise we wouldn't have taken the time to first learn about it!
It's why your town is currently infested with candidate signs in every public space. It's also why incumbents have such large advantages in elections and why dead/convicted politicians (or Last-name sharing family members of those politicians) are often elected after the fact.
Snapz 13h ago • 100%
They should
Snapz 21h ago • 25%
Nobody is entertaining your hypothetical. Neither.
Don't waste your time considering this nonsense. Vote.
Snapz 1d ago • 0%
So he's completely removed from anything to do with that company and isn't inherently woven into the DNA as it's very recent founder?
Snapz 2d ago • 100%
AI buddy, you can just PACk up those conspiracy theories and leave.
Snapz 2d ago • 83%
Old weird, decaying corpse, spattered with orange face paint and smelling of shit mixed with sweat, hairspray and fried fish.
Snapz 2d ago • 100%
Also noticed that affluent areas often have donation centers that don't have attached stores - because they want that fucking treasure for online listings probably.
Snapz 2d ago • 90%
Just helpful to remember, as all this horseshit persists, Bluesky is Jack Dorsey. Dorsey is former head of Twitter and musk's good buddy.
It's all a losing proposition, whatever direction you move - except if you move... Away.
Snapz 2d ago • 100%
You're tone was dismissive to those people, it wasn't leaving room for them. It was inclusive to others "like you" in the know.
But by all means, retcon until you feel good about yourself
Snapz 3d ago • 100%
Because... Beyond this line, property is threatened. Planes are expensive. You can die in the front, we can rebuild that cheaply. But planes are expensive.
Remember kids, if you see uniformed authority figures, they are there to protect property above all else.
Snapz 3d ago • 100%
The only way to stop a bad guy with a bomb...
Snapz 3d ago • 100%
Mine is a knife, reach in to entry pockets at TSA baggage xray, a moment where I'm afraid I'll pull out a giant knife
Snapz 3d ago • 100%
Reprogram your bot, bro... It's stupid.
Snapz 3d ago • 100%
Statements like "but we already knew" are never helpful. Something like that is really just meant for you to performatively proclaim, "I actually knew this already!"
Plenty of people who aren't as enlightened as you are just now learning or just coming of age to be politically aware. Maybe they were in one of the various operating religious/political cults in the world today sheltering them from objective reality. Leave some room for them to learn something new and feel ownership in that new awareness.
Just literally zero value in "duh! Tell me something I don't know!". If anything, it risks derailing the enthusiasm building in someone who wanted to help who now feels "stupid" and "not in the club" so they get quiet.
Snapz 3d ago • 100%
RT is russia is putin is russia is RT
Snapz 3d ago • 100%
He doesn't need money, he's a little prep school heir from step mommy with a father that also spent his life grifting for the republicans. What he needs is validation. He needs to feel like people aren't laughing at him. But they always are, and they always will. Same with trump - That's why they are now hoping to kill enough of the other side so that the only people left in the room are the ones who are not paying attention except to clap when they hear "freedom" or "woke".
Seriously though, the truth is that trump is 80 and he will statistically die relatively soon. The same fear applies, "they aren't going to laugh at me". Give him a chance and trump will literally throw the match in the gasoline soaked world behind him on the way out, just for the comfort that he won't be made fun of in death or properly exposed in full context by history.
Snapz 3d ago • 100%
Statements like "This isn't news" are never helpful. Something like that is really just meant for you to performatively proclaim, "I actually knew this already!"
Plenty of people who aren't as enlightened as you are just now learning or just coming of age to be politically aware. Maybe they were in one of the various operating religious/political cults in the world today sheltering them from objective reality. Leave some room for them to learn something new and feel ownership in that new awareness.
Just literally zero value in "duh! Tell me something I don't know!". If anything, it risks derailing the enthusiasm building in someone who wanted to help who now feels "stupid" and "not in the club" so they get quiet. Something useful enough in the second half of your statement though.
Snapz 3d ago • 100%
Yes this, sure, but also he LITERALLY went to Russia, as they were invading Ukraine, and filmed some slop where he went into their supermarkets and walked around and said, "Hey... Now this is pretty fucking nice! They got broccoli and shit!"
It's so fucking naked.
I heard a person call into a show the other day, voice only, and talk about some poor working conditions at a factory. Made me think about how it would probably be so easy for nefarious bosses to be able to identify that person through voice recognition SW with all of the data that comes from us looking directly into cameras and speaking clearly in modern workplace meetings. Do "anonymous" callers need to start using voice modulation software for these kinds of calls in the modern world?
As a little background, I didn't actively use Reddit for months following the blackout. I still barely stop in over there and if I do I'm never logged in our contributing to the communities there (where I was previously a daily poster/commenter). Just bringing up a point that I'm not sure I'd seen anyone discussing directly over here; **the general sentiment and quality of posted information on Reddit has become tangibly worse in multiple ways** (I think coinciding with this group, us, leaving). Now don't get me wrong, Reddit sucked in many ways and for long before the migrations to Lemmy, but there is a noticeable difference in a few key areas: 1. Less skepticism in replies 2. Less sourcing of information in posts and replies 3. Less counter positions expressed generally 4. If there is a decent reply, you have to scroll much further down to find it 5. Less plain labeling of obvious bullshit Many of us used to introduce counter viewpoints or clarifying information into posts, with sources. That functionally worked as a roadblock to stall the quickly building momentum of disinformation/misinformation. Those roadblocks often feel absent over there now, IMO. Not saying we hold a responsibility to go back there or that we were saving lives before, but the difference is very apparent to me - Have you seen it? Any examples?
This was on the roku app on a TV, haven't explored other platforms yet. I'm assuming this is to disable the ability for users to quickly start, back/exit and restart a video until an ad doesn't play. Eternally user hostile, enshitification bullshit.
Assuming to artificially secure people with new memberships through their first 4-6 weeks to establish a habit through the first billing cycle. Is this a known thing?
Through the great depression... When 9/11 happened... The 2008 housing crash... COVID... On a smaller scale, when the Titanic sank, I'm assuming someone inevitably got rich from the aftermath somehow? **Who are the people/groups that make up history's must successful parasites?** Who *"came out on top"* in each instance of historical human suffering?
The rest of them all look good, but Addison just looks like a professional ball player out the gate.
So obviously we're all on Lemmy for a complicated combination of reasons, but we all likely share some common ground, namely... * need for privacy * need to own/control/access the data we produce * healthy skepticism about the trustworthiness of for-profit corporations, in general So if we don't want meta to know even innocuous things; like how many times/when we message our grandma, and we don't google to know when we're searching for remedies to a rash, and we don't want reddit to... Well we just don't want reddit - we don't want them to profit from or weaponize that data against us in a myriad ways. We also don't want them artificially removing features and creating tiered layers of service/value hidden behind a paywall (I understand this is very present in the some of the commercially available DNA services). So that brings me to DNA testing services. Since they started to emerge in the mainstream they were immediately an interesting, exciting novelty and I also knew it was data I wouldn't feel safe trusting with a for-profit org - with broken systems like law enforcement and health insurers on speed dial and just salivating for the goodies they collect. **So all that considered, any groups that provide this type of service that you do trust/use, and why?**
Hey all, I used to use a to do app and can't remember name, it was very distinct though, please help! * visual aesthetic was of an IRL open paper journal (distinct touch: out had a coffee stain on upper corner of the paper) * extremely simple, text input on lines and a checkbox to complete (animation of pen crossing by hand would play IIRC) * only option besides complete/delete was to move to "tomorrow". Then when you flipped the page (animation) you'd see the next day's tasks. * only looked at today and tomorrow in favor of simplicity * For some reason, I want to think it was just called "today" or "tomorrow". Any ideas?