What's your argument ? They are rightfully banning people that support terrorists. The banned people are the fascists.

Solar cells that generate electricity

Yes they send some but the supply has been more or less dry. And they don't seem to be ordering new ones. The UK literally suggested Germany could send them Taurus in exchange for Storm Shadow because they ran out and their new replacement missle is still in development and that is why they arent buying any new ones. Also anyone else could have bought Taurus or similar missles to send to Ukraine but they aren't. Also UK/France are not the only countries that have similar systems. Yet you never hear complaints about them not sending them.

Germany has been delivering big weapons packages frequently. Others are mostly talking. This "block" in EU parliament is not suddenly going to make the others srop putting on shows and making some real actions. https://www.politico.eu/article/france-talk-tough-ukraine-while-gobble-up-more-russia-gas/

Everyone was harping on Germany for gas imports. Yet now we have Macron making big speeches about supporting Ukraine. Then they barely send any real support and instead secretly they are importing tons of Russian LNG.

That's just another show like Macrons big words about Russia. There will be no action. What makes you think suddenly there will be a difference? Other countries also have cruise missiles like Taurus but aren't sending them. Only thing you hear is blaming Germany for not sending Taurus.

Yet somehow people buy all the rhetoric.

Still better than nuclear fuel refined in Russia. Or gas from Russia.

Would be nice if someone else would be stepping up as well. Germany hardly has any military to speak of yet it is somehow delivering the most weapons in recent months/weeks.

I somehow doubt they will stop if Israel stops bombing Gaza. They will just move the goalposts.

If it's an official Video they will have a publicly known speaker and official branding. Also official accounts on YouTube or other platforms like Twitter.

Very confusing indeed since the name and title of the Community aren't the same.

What's the difference between a video from a media outlet and a written article by the same outlet ?

Not accepting video or text pieces seems someewhat limiting. Sometimes those are quite important News.

Also I can't seem to find the world community.

I rotate between a Keychron Q1, Keychron Q3 and GMMK Pro.

The fact that we have had around 100 or more articles about Hamas and attacks from Hamas members in the last few days says your question is somewhat superficial.

Everyone seems to agree that it is news. There's plenty of articles about individuals claiming to be for Palestine that make very questionable statements.

You know what the big difference here is though?

Israel has very broad support in the rest of the world. Especially the west. The most powerful economies on the planet. Who send Israel tons of aid. The US just parked an aircraft carrier strike group in their front yard.

Both sides have fanatics stating how they want to eradicate the other. Only one said has absolute control over the other though and has the means to actually follow through with their plans.

You are asking the wrong question. The question is "what are they losing from this" and the answer is nothing. They have committed war crimes for decades and not only is nobody turning away from them instead they get pumped full of even more and better weapons. Look at all the aid the west (mainly US) is sending them.

Why would they ever think about potential consequences if there are never any?

When was the last time the US had issues with supporting an entity that violates human rights and commits war crimes.

Plenty of examples of the US arming those up. Only to later start a war against them.

So then we shouldn't support Israel or Hamas. Since both of them act like terrorists.

God forbid the shareholders aren't happy.

Why not ? Because it paints a negative light on Israelis and the genocidal thoughts that seemingly some of them have ?