L'argument généralement donné est qu'on ne dé-fédère pas de toutes les instances, mais de 2 dont le thème spécifique est lié à leur comportement.

Le second est qu'il faut traiter les intolérants/autoritaires de la même façon, qu'ils se disent de gauche ou pas, et que la question ne se poserait pas si on parlait d'instances néo-nazies, par exemple.

Il faut se rendre sur chaque vote, et voter pour ou contre avec les flèches, je vais essayer de rendre ça plus clair.

Mon avis personnel, pour ceux que ça intéresse, est que ces deux instances sont remplies de ce qu'on qualifie ici de rouges-bruns, tankies, ou encore fascistes de gauche.

Ce sont avant tout des autoritaires qui aiment se dire de gauche, mais utilisent les mêmes outils, ont la même vision politique, la même organisation, et ont tendance politiquement et historiquement à s'allier aux fascistes "officiels" dès qu'un mouvement réellement de gauche révolutionnaire émerge.

Je trouvais tolérable de "ne rien faire" tant qu'ils restaient dans leurs coins, mais j'avais un peu oublié qu'un autoritaire reste un autoritaire et que la seule place qu'ils méritent est dans un puits, en n'oubliant pas de frapper les mains qui tentent de sortir avec un gros baton.

Quite ironic, coming from someone that most likely "did his own research", and decided to come pollute a subject in a foreign instance with regurgitated fash propaganda. 👍

I’m sure you won’t answer to this following the argumentative playbook of an authoritarian troll that will most likely dismiss any provided source as western propaganda, or with an argumentative mille-feuilles full of the stupidest takes I’ve seen.

So, as expected.

I asked you why you are right and the U.N. is wrong. You’ve refused to answer that.

No, I've answered why a commission that was looking at only part of the situation could not, by design, conclude to anything else that crime against humanity. That's why I've added the historical element, that you still keep ignoring, for the third time, when it's the main argument in the first place.

You’ve also refused to provide any examples of a reputable international organization that disagrees with the U.N.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution_of_Uyghurs_in_China#Genocide

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution_of_Uyghurs_in_China#Ethnocide_or_cultural_genocide

This is what I refer to "wilful ignorance".

Could also check the ICIJ if you'd like independent orgs.

All you’ve done is lie about what the U.N. report says

No, what I did was just pointing out that you were lying by minimizing the actual content of this report, and once I made that obvious, resorted to legalism.

“This has included far-reaching, arbitrary and discriminatory restrictions on human rights and fundamental freedoms, in violation of international laws and standards”, including restrictions on religious freedom and the rights to privacy and movement.

Furthermore, the report said that Chinese Government policies in the region have “transcended borders”, separating families, “severing” contacts, producing “patterns of intimidations and threats” against the wider Uyghur diaspora who have spoken out about conditions at home.

Let's add to that the settlement colonialism and all the other shit I've listed previously, and tell me how it's not an attempt to erase Uyghurs identity and people.

pretend you don’t understand the difference between genocide and mistreatment of prisoners

I do. I guess the holocaust was not a genocide because they were also all rounded up in camps as prisoners. That's legalism that only libshit used to use.

Can you tell me how the following fits the category of "mistreatment of prisoners" more than "genocide" maybe?

• Force them to erase their culture and identity by forcing the loss of customs, culture, religion and language through torture and punishment, even execution (historical)
• Force them to erase their culture and identity by forcing the loss of customs, culture, religion and language through torture and punishment, even execution (modern continuation)
• Have a separate set of laws between undesirables and desirables
• Force this ethnicity to disappear by settling the region with a "purer" ethnicity, having forced marriages and different reproduction quotas for both ethnicities while also having a national policy to send settlers directly live in their home.
• When this doesn't work fast enough and the oppressed people start to rebel one time too many, put them in camps per the millions, deny having camps, when it's too obvious you're lying, lie more saying that's just re-education camps, when it doesn't work again, call them terrorists internment camps.
• Once put into camps, separate the childrens that you'll brainwash into identity erasure

When I see this kind of shit happening in Gaza, I call it a genocide, even before the oct. 7th events. Same in Armenia, Myanmar, Cambodia, Chechenia or whatever else other country doing this shit because I don't use selective acceptance of genocide.

I'm sure you won't answer to this following the argumentative playbook of an authoritarian troll that will most likely dismiss any provided source as western propaganda, or with an argumentative mille-feuilles full of the stupidest takes I've seen.

You keep rambling on source-free while not addressing anything I said.

You not getting the point is not me not addressing what you said. Me not giving an history lesson on the Xinjiang region history to you when you can find accounts from all sides online for free, is not rambling, it's just not engaging with the sealioning of the latest brand of redfash.

This is how you “base your worldview on international organizations” yet wind up ignoring those organizations when they don’t back up your atrocity propaganda.

No, they do. One of them "only" speaks of crime against humanity so it's the one you decided represented the truth. I'm sure you're using the same logic with Palestine and Israel, right?

You can just stop here with the common auth rhetoric, you're a bootlicker, coming from a bootlicker instance, that has erected double standards as an olympic level sport. Anything that goes against your fairy tale must be propaganda, everything that agrees with it is truth. Any contradictor is a counter-revolutionary/liberal/fascist, and I swear after this last purge we'll achieve communism bro.

No I swear bro, this is not genocide if it does not come from the genocide region in France, otherwise it's just sparkling crime against humanity.

That's literally the hasbara playbook to deny genociding the palestinians lol. If it weren't so sad, it would be funny.

No, I'm pointing out that in the report you've decided to forget that it was speaking about the systemic way of treating the local muslim population as subpar humans and breaching their fundamental freedoms on a daily basis, while, and once again you "forgot" to respond to it, leading a program of culture erasure since the 50's and the Xinjiang independence was in the name of "stability" and "war on terror" since the 90's, using official language change, customs erasure and legislation, while also limiting far more the reproduction rights of the Uyghurs compared to the Hans settlers.

This shit is known, once again, since the 50's, and was documented and reported far before China was considered an economical threat or even a developing nation. Once again, it was such a point of contention between the USSR and the CCP that it lead to multiple wars in the region, documented by the chinese, the ussr, and "the west". At this point, this is willful ignorance.

You consistently "forgetting" about the history of the region, minimizing the human rights violation when it's made by bootwearers with a red flag, and turning millions in "re-education" camps as "just a few individual acts of torture on prisoners", just shows that you just don't give a fuck and that you're just here for the contrarian aesthetic. The simple fact that the UN, which is in big part an organization used to justify and excuse colonialism has to call this shit "crime against humanity" is telling. The meekest of all international organisation cannot even excuse this without it looking like too much bootlicking.

You'd be born 10 years earlier, you would have been radicalized on 4chan instead and would be "ironically" shitposting about holocaust denial and saying shit like "no bro I swear this wasn't a genocide, Hitler wanted to build a jewish paradise on Madagascar, the camps were just temporary work camps and they had to let jews die because the Allies broke the supply lines". You'd be using the same rhetoric to minimize the actions of yet another authoritarian regime dabbling in ethnic cleansing, but since today being a nazi is too mainstream, the new flavor of boot to lick is chinese.

I'm old enough to remember irl tankies, and you're still all the same and will rather side with fascists whenever your limited view of what the left and even communism is is challenged.

You're an authoritarian LARPing as a leftist.

Imagine resorting to moral relativism and legalism to defend crimes against humanity.

Worst than shitlibs and fascists loving centroids.

Are you for real?

Did you read the report you linked? Is your argument truly that it's ok because the word genocide was not employed and it's just sparkly ethnic cleansing and crime against humanity?

“allegations of patterns of torture, or ill-treatment, including forced medical treatment and adverse conditions of detention, are credible, as are allegations of individual incidents of sexual and gender-based violence.” Tweet URL

In a strongly-worded assessment at the end of the report, OHCHR said that the extent of arbitrary detentions against Uyghur and others, in context of “restrictions and deprivation more generally of fundamental rights, enjoyed individually and collectively, may constitute international crimes, in particular crimes against humanity.”

This is not even talking about the forced erasure of the Uyghur by "importation" of Hans chinese in the province and forced marriage that, once again, was known and criticized even by the Soviets since the 50's.

I don’t know about other countries, but I could link to 100 U.S.-based articles in the past few years fearmongering about China. Trump railed against China even before Covid, Covid spawned all sorts of anti-Chinese xenophobia and conspiracy theories, Biden made a big deal out of having the military shoot down a Chinese weather balloon that strayed over the U.S., etc.

Yeah, and that's achieving what exactly? For an alleged ML you're kind of ignoring the material view of this.

That serves absolutely no purpose for the US, the Xinjiang region provides half of the materials needed for electronics in the world, on which the US economy and power heavily relies on.

China is an enormous economic competitor with nukes that is also communist. It is very much a target of the U.S. empire.

"communist" yeah right lol, their flag is red I guess yeah

It's not even really a target for the US empire since they decided to offshore all their production there. They're entirely dependent on them, and financing Chinese economical imperialism in Africa and South America indirectly.

I know it exists and is pretty common in disinformation and propaganda, which is why I wait for international organizations, independent reporters and numerous testimonies before reaching for conclusions.

I also like to consider that when these are the same people and organizations that are making Israel actions public and asking for genocide recognition, than the ones that are doing the same with the Uyghurs genocide for like a decade or two now, they are not Schrodinger propagandists that act at the same time against and for the interests of the US and its imperialists friends (France included).

When I see people making claims that a genocide is not happening when there is an egregious amount of evidences already, using the shittiest wiki entry I've ever seen somewhere in this thread, written by a chinese national from a chinese IP (the edit log is public), with half of the entry having no reference, the other one having chinese state media and youtube videos as source, I'm not only going to be skeptical, but I'll also consider that you'll end up with all the other genocide deniers in history. One of your mate cited Zenz as a gotcha when this shit is known since the 50's and was even a point of contention between the PRC and the Soviets.

Also, as a last note, it doesn't even make sense that the Uyghur genocide would be used as atrocity propaganda simply because of the fact that nobody in the West cares about chineses, muslims and even less about chinese muslims. What would be the point?

In Kuweit and Iraq, it was used to make direct intervention in the country "acceptable" or even positively viewed by the mass. Here, the goal is what? To have sanctions upon China that would cripple only the western economy?

I'll end on a personal note tangentially related that is kind of my conclusion for this whole thread:

Seing all of you parading as "true" leftists while spouting the chinese equivalent of hasbara and not even seing the irony in this makes me hate you even more that shitlibs, and that's even before even considering the history and damage that tankies have done to the worldwide leftist and especially revolutionary movement for the last century.

You'll take whatever is thrown in front of you that agrees with you as proof that you're right rather that actually challenging your views, and for what? Licking the boots of yet another authoritarian regime with state capitalism and a history of purging minorities and commonly violating human rights?

You should try discussing with actual leftist that are not authoritarian cosplayers, far more common in these groups!

Yes, but not only.

So close to understand my obvious point, you can do it!

Who could have thought that on a french instance, you'd find french terms and formulas.

A mystery for the ages.

De mon point de vue c'est des gens un peu cons qui ont suivi le même pipeline de radicalisation qu'il y'avait y'a 10 ans sur 4chan, sauf qu'être un nazi est aujourd'hui mainstream.

Le pipeline d'edgy contrarien c'est donc l'inverse, celui des tankies qui viennent lécher les bottes d'un autoritaire et commettre des génocides, mais cette fois-ci, avec un drapeau rouge. Même attrait pour l'homme fort providentiel, l'élimination d'opposants à la définition aussi floue que variable, aux réponses simples à des problèmes complexes, et un goût prononcé pour les bottes en cuir.

Ils seraient nés 10 ans plus tôt, ils seraient MAGA tier à se branler sur du Camus (Renaud) tout en niant l'existence de la shoah à l'aide de blogs de schizophrènes marginaux.

Either you believe this term was coined after internet forums started existing, or you're talking about me writing wrongly "tankie" as "tanky", which I only did because I have to write in a second language to people too busy licking boots to learn a language different than english.

In both case it's pretty cringe.

You should try TOR marketplaces.

On passerait à côté de participations de qualité comme dans ce thread.

I no longer feel sympathy towards the french

Kinda cringe than in all french history, that's what it took you.

Meh, I use tanky to differentiate between leftists and people that cosplay as leftist while excusing genocide and human rights violation whenever it's their flavor of autocrat doing it, not really as an anti-communist word since nobody uses it like that in the first place.

it sets a firm limit on how radical someone can be

No, it sets a limit on how much you accept your fellow comrades from being used as a stepping tool by an authoritarian regime/dictator to be able to call yourself "communist", while ending up in state capitalism anyway.

I may concede that from my years on hexbear, I associate most participants to this kind of communism flavor by default, which may not be your case, but this thread did not really start in good faith, so why would I.