Lawyers gonna lawy.

What's the idpol angle on this? This seems more like a "return to monke" story.

Dudes built a secret tunnel to an abandoned building, as one does, and Big Government came to step on them. They'll do that to anybody, not just Hasids.

Peacock streaming network going to shut down.

Is there a standards body web developers should rely on, which suggests requiring MFA for every account? OWASP, for example, only recommends requiring it for administrative users, but for giving regular users the option without requiring it.

There’s some positives to requiring MFA for all users, but like any decision there’s trade offs. How can we throw 23andme under the bus when they were compliant with industry best practices?

i think that’s the core issue. Whatever kind of sewage system you have is going to be a source of entertainment for some people

dual redundancy for every organ, and the ability for a damaged or removed organ to grow back.

the volume of actual AI misinformation is going to pale in comparison to the volume of people trying to use AI misinformation as a boogeyman to scare you into voting a certain way.

Hah, all the drama over Tesla issuing automatic updates and calling them “recalls”… at least they’re able to update their software.

Dang, I’ll try to avoid crashing until after the update is installed.

Obesity modeled as a disease that should be treated with drugs like Ozempic. I’ll buy that it’s like that for some very small set of people, but I can’t shake the assumption that drug companies are exaggerating so they can sell more, and most of their customers are just too lazy to try proper diet and exercise.

A better solution, experts say, would be to require Tesla to use cameras to monitor drivers’ eyes to make sure they’re watching the road. Some Teslas do have interior-facing cameras. But they don’t see well at night, unlike those in General Motors or Ford driver monitoring systems, said Philip Koopman, a professor at Carnegie Mellon University who studies vehicle automation safety.

In case you were wondering who wrote the article

Why not go ahead and buy one today?

Tesla told the woman that it could not remove her husband’s access to the car’s technology because his name remained on the vehicle’s title as a co-owner, along with hers, according to records she filed in her lawsuit.

This sounds like a problem courts needed to resolve, not Tesla. They don't reasonably know which spouse has legal possession of the car.

Every tech demo ever is fake, with the possible exception of the original Cybertruck demo, but I suspect even that one just wasn’t faked very well.

Subjective biases can play a huge part in stuff like this. The researchers behind this story had to go through a bunch of YouTube channels and determine whether they constitute extremist right wing content or not.

I think it’s a safe assumption that if you took the people consuming that content and asked them whether the video they just watched was right wing extremist content, most of them would say no.

So, it’s possible that you don’t think you’re being overwhelmed with right wing extremist content, but that somebody else looking at your viewing history might think you are.

We should give them some of those cluster bombs we gave to Ukraine.

The golden rule is that all documentation is out of date. Trust but verify etc.

Check out Palm Springs.

Cars made of metal do more damage when running down pedestrians than cars made of nerf do. Is the solution to make all cars out of nerf, or to stop running down pedestrians?

Wasn't that the hate group on Babylon 5?