Disney has a garbage production problem

<3

Xitter

[sarcasm]

That sounds like what a Russian propagandian would say.

If that’s not a word, it should be a word. Lets also rename the continent to Propagandia while we are at it.

I hope you keep posting! Keep up the good work.

I think likes are your best gauge for your best content. Dislikes could be easily used as an indicator to gauge audiences you dont target in the same manner. Value in all data.

No.

It is like and dislike.

Stop trying to justify it as anything else.

That whole laughable expedition stinks of financial fraud

This is the very definition of gas lighting.

Customers: “This is not what I paid for”

Colossal Order: “You’re so toxic”

If they dont drop the price by at least 50% goodbye nVidia.

So no more nVidia. Hello Intel.

They want high crime. Eat the rich.

Law has to be universally applied to all candidates.

Otherwise dems risk being kept from office.

The fact you think people need an LLM to create garbage is just weird. They can do it without it just fine. Better get some tinfoil, I hear putting it on your head stops the Artifical word predictor from copying your thoughts.

Not new and certainly very much not new to politics. Are you new?

Again not new stop grandstanding it as a new effect. Media outlets have been doing this since the dawn of journalism. Scientific process created to combat it, political standards to help reduce it fand laws to make it financially unattractive act remains its not new.

The only thing that is new. The financial gain from the hype of abusing the word AI and thr media not calling it out. But hey here we are back at the start. Its not new.

Propaganda isn’t new. Sure it’s more widely available now but it’s not new

I wouldnt be too worried they’ve just made an over glorified word predictor and blender of peoples art

The realestate claim is just plain backwards. It does depend on the person, but making the claim that people in general are happy to donate part of their home to their employer and impact their families with work from home is just wrong. Emails instead of meetings should be common sense for status meetings and has no impact on the choice to work from home. Meetings that have agendas should be in person, especially if its on sensitive topics. All reasons I have listed above.

Some people sure do benefit working from home. I liked no commute, it saved a lot of money and wasted time but it made home worse.

We work to live. Work should have no place in our home.

You have it backwards. Completely.

1. I have no intentions of bringing my work home, work is a job, it has no place in my home impacting my family.
2. I will not lose a part of my home to my jobs business. Its not their property, it is my home.i would rather the office be a bedroom so my children dont have to share a room.
3. We evolved without video conferencing, it is natural and easier to meet with someone in person to convey emotion and understand people we meet with. It is too easy to dismiss someone over a screen, empathy is too easily lost. It is also harder to be ignored in person.
4. I can see when my ataff are struggling off meeting or when talking to others and help them. This is a bit micro-managey however I value the insight especially for staff that struggle to communicate.

The only thing I loath about working in another building is: the commute and distractions. The commute is expensive and a huge waste of time. I try and minimise the time waste with audio books but its forced waste of money. The distractions can be minimised with headphones.

Absolutely the large language models are over glorified word predictors that get it wrong. I’d go so far as to say, they get it wrong nearly all the time.